<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>GG</title>
    <description>A handwritten blog</description>
    <link>https://gg.handwritten.blog/</link>
    <atom:link href="https://gg.handwritten.blog/feed.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>The first post is always phatic </title>
      <link>https://gg.handwritten.blog/the-first-post-is-always-phatic</link>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">tag:handwritten.blog,2026:post:259</guid>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Aug 2026 13:08:03 +0000</pubDate>
      <description>
        <![CDATA[<p><img src="https://gg.handwritten.blog/rails/public_image_variants/eyJfcmFpbHMiOnsiZGF0YSI6ODc1LCJwdXIiOiJibG9iX2lkIn19--fba00135d63c97be8db97b5bd72b4eba9d557e6a/web_1600/Bloggo-1.webp" alt="The first post is always phatic , handwritten page 1"/></p><p>**26/08/26**</p>

<p>Honestly not so sure how I feel about this. My knee-jerk reaction, having seen the original handwritten blog, was that it did not match Daniel’s original approach. After some time, having come to appreciate that&#39;s entirely besides the point, and in a world of adversarial relations between server and client:</p>

<p>* accessible, semantic HTML with (formally) well-written prose is taken as an &quot;LLMism&quot;, inviting calls for the author to &quot;prove&quot; their humanity
<br />* readers/users/clients are forced to &quot;prove&quot; their humanity</p>

<p>Sucky place to be in. But I can see how handwriting can be a workaround.</p>]]>
      </description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
